Problems linking Access to SQL replicated tables

Hello!
I was wondering if anyone could help me.
I am running an Access application that uses linked tables to connect to a SQL server.
Ever since I turned on replication on those tables, I cannot add records to the table using regular Access forms (and, for that matter, I cannot do it by just double-clicking on the table from Access and trying to enter records).

Any help will be greatly appreciated!!!!!Have you also refreshed those links i.e.(deleted the links and recreated them in Access) since you "turned on replication on those tables" (or not)?|||Yes, I have deleted the link and recreated it after turning on replication, but I still get the same error every time I add a record.|||You are able to add a row via query analyzer or EM, and the table is not a read only subscribed table you are attempting to add rows to? (just asking the obvious things)
If all that is in order you might check to see if the generated link schemas include columns that the system automatically populates with data. If there are some (replication related columns) or others such as identity, GUID, timestamp, etc. columns (that are automatically populated), try removing them from the Access link schemas (not the base tables) then recreate your link(s) and attempt a test row insert. If that does not work try creating a view (test insertion in QA / EM), then create a linked table to the view and test its behavior.sql

Problems in Creating Views in Sql

Hi everybody,
I have couple of Access databases needed to be
converted to access/Sql Client/Server database, which is new to me. I
am trying to convert my access quries to Sql Views or Stored
Procedures. I have run into a problem currently when creating view in
Sql:
I need to create some columns based on conditions of other columns,
for example:
1. Column example 1:
IIf([Column1]=-1,[ListPrice]*[Volume],IIf([Column2]=-1,0,[ListPrice]*Volume]))
2. Column example 2:
IIf(Len([Product].[P_No])<10,"",SUBSTRING([Product].[P_No],6,5))
3.Column example 3:
IIf([CustType]="D",([Field1]+[Field2])*[Volume],Field1*Volume)
The above are actually the columns that I need to create.
I have these functions built in Access Queries, but not sure how to
build them in Sql views. Have tried different ways, but failed.
Any body knows how to do it?
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
Thanks in advance!"Shelley" <schow@.hersheys.com> wrote in message
news:e085e628.0402020838.450efcdc@.posting.google.com...
> 3.Column example 3:
> IIf([CustType]="D",([Field1]+[Field2])*[Volume],Field1*Volume)
Take a look at the CASE statement in the online help.|||"Freddy" <noemail@.noemail> wrote in message news:<OT0rBBb6DHA.2524@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>...
> "Shelley" <schow@.hersheys.com> wrote in message
> news:e085e628.0402020838.450efcdc@.posting.google.com...
> > 3.Column example 3:
> > IIf([CustType]="D",([Field1]+[Field2])*[Volume],Field1*Volume)
> Take a look at the CASE statement in the online help.
Thanks Freddy.
This one works.

Problems in Creating Views in Sql

Hi everybody,
I have couple of Access databases needed to be
converted to access/Sql Client/Server database, which is new to me. I
am trying to convert my access quries to Sql Views or Stored
Procedures. I have run into a problem currently when creating view in
Sql:
I need to create some columns based on conditions of other columns,
for example:
1. Column example 1:
IIf([Column1]=-1,[ListPrice]*[Volume],IIf([Column2]=-1,0,[ListPrice]*Volume]))
2. Column example 2:
IIf(Len([Product].[P_No])<10,"",SUBSTRING([Product].[P_No],6,5))
3.Column example 3:
IIf([CustType]="D" ,([Field1]+[Field2])*[Volume],Field1*Vol
ume)
The above are actually the columns that I need to create.
I have these functions built in Access Queries, but not sure how to
build them in Sql views. Have tried different ways, but failed.
Any body knows how to do it?
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
Thanks in advance!"Shelley" <schow@.hersheys.com> wrote in message
news:e085e628.0402020838.450efcdc@.posting.google.com...

quote:

---

> 3.Column example 3:
> IIf([CustType]="D" ,([Field1]+[Field2])*[Volume],Field1*Vol
ume)

---

Take a look at the CASE statement in the online help.|||"Freddy" <noemail@.noemail> wrote in message news:<OT0rBBb6DHA.2524@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>...

quote:

---

> "Shelley" <schow@.hersheys.com> wrote in message
> news:e085e628.0402020838.450efcdc@.posting.google.com...
> Take a look at the CASE statement in the online help.

---

Thanks Freddy.
This one works.

Problems exporting to Excel

I am having a problem exporting a linked SQL server table from Access 2003
to
Excel. The file is about 2,000 records with several columns. The problem
is that when the table is imported into excel some of the records are not
coming across with the correct data and when numeric fields are summed the
totals are wrong.
When I export directly to Excel from the SQL server using DTS, I don't have
this problem. Has anyone else had this problem? Anyone have ideas of how to
fix it? I need to be able to allow the users to create queries in access
and export the data they need, so setting up a DTS as a solution is not
really workable (or at least I don't think it is).Hi Jim,
Being that this works fine from SQL Server but you are
having problems from MS Access, it's likely an MS Access
issue that you may want to post in one of the MS Access
newsgroups. Maybe try the following group:
microsoft.public.access.externaldata
-Sue
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:52:39 GMT, "JIM" <jcrisp1@.kc.rr.com>
wrote:

>I am having a problem exporting a linked SQL server table from Access 2003
>to
>Excel. The file is about 2,000 records with several columns. The problem
>is that when the table is imported into excel some of the records are not
>coming across with the correct data and when numeric fields are summed the
>totals are wrong.
>When I export directly to Excel from the SQL server using DTS, I don't have
>this problem. Has anyone else had this problem? Anyone have ideas of how t
o
>fix it? I need to be able to allow the users to create queries in access
>and export the data they need, so setting up a DTS as a solution is not
>really workable (or at least I don't think it is).
>

Problems due to @@IDENTITY

I have a database that sits on SQL Server 2000 and the client is Access XP
connecting to SQL via ODBC.
The database has been in use since November 2003 and all has been working
well. However......over the past w a strange thing has been happening
that, when new customer details were entered and the record was saved, the
displayed record would change to that of another although the new record had
been saved to the table.
At first I thought it was Access playing around (bless it) but have since
discovered the true cause. Whenever a new customer is entered, a SQL
trigger fires that will also create a dummy record in another table
(tbl_MainCaseEntry) ready for the user to enter details. There is an
essential reason for the trigger but it is too long winded to explain why.
The trigger reads:
CREATE TRIGGER trg_NewCustomer
ON tbl_Customer
FOR INSERT
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @.CustID INT, @.CaseCount INT
SET @.CustID = (SELECT CustomerID FROM Inserted)
INSERT INTO tbl_MainCaseEntry (CustomerID) VALUES(@.CustID)
END
The field CustomerID in tbl_MainCaseEntry is the foreign key with the table
having it's own primary key of MainID (set as an identity field seeded
(1,1)).
I have since discovered via the Query Analyser that @.@.IDENTITY is pulling
back the last identity field for the entire statement (in this case the
MainID in tbl_MainCaseEntry for the new record created by the trigger).
Is there any way that I can stop this from happening by using
IDENT_CURRENT('tbl_Customer') and making sure that @.@.IDENTITY is forced back
to this value? I have tried to use SET @.@.IDENTITY =
IDENT_CURRENT('tbl_Customer') but this does not work.
Any advice would be appreciated as this is driving me mad!!
Regards
DazzaUse SCOPE_IDENTITY, not @.@.IDENTITY. This side effect is well documented.
Please post DDL, sample data and desired results.
See http://www.aspfaq.com/5006 for info.
"Dazza" <Post2Group@.Only.com> wrote in message
news:#3683HKMFHA.1096@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I have a database that sits on SQL Server 2000 and the client is Access XP
> connecting to SQL via ODBC.
> The database has been in use since November 2003 and all has been working
> well. However......over the past w a strange thing has been
happening
> that, when new customer details were entered and the record was saved, the
> displayed record would change to that of another although the new record
had
> been saved to the table.
> At first I thought it was Access playing around (bless it) but have since
> discovered the true cause. Whenever a new customer is entered, a SQL
> trigger fires that will also create a dummy record in another table
> (tbl_MainCaseEntry) ready for the user to enter details. There is an
> essential reason for the trigger but it is too long winded to explain why.
> The trigger reads:
> CREATE TRIGGER trg_NewCustomer
> ON tbl_Customer
> FOR INSERT
> AS
> BEGIN
> DECLARE @.CustID INT, @.CaseCount INT
> SET @.CustID = (SELECT CustomerID FROM Inserted)
> INSERT INTO tbl_MainCaseEntry (CustomerID) VALUES(@.CustID)
> END
> The field CustomerID in tbl_MainCaseEntry is the foreign key with the
table
> having it's own primary key of MainID (set as an identity field seeded
> (1,1)).
> I have since discovered via the Query Analyser that @.@.IDENTITY is pulling
> back the last identity field for the entire statement (in this case the
> MainID in tbl_MainCaseEntry for the new record created by the trigger).
> Is there any way that I can stop this from happening by using
> IDENT_CURRENT('tbl_Customer') and making sure that @.@.IDENTITY is forced
back
> to this value? I have tried to use SET @.@.IDENTITY =
> IDENT_CURRENT('tbl_Customer') but this does not work.
> Any advice would be appreciated as this is driving me mad!!
> Regards
> Dazza
>|||Have you tried using SCOPE_IDENTITY already?
Look it up in BOL to learn more.
-Jason
"Dazza" <Post2Group@.Only.com> wrote in message
news:#3683HKMFHA.1096@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I have a database that sits on SQL Server 2000 and the client is Access XP
> connecting to SQL via ODBC.
> The database has been in use since November 2003 and all has been working
> well. However......over the past w a strange thing has been
happening
> that, when new customer details were entered and the record was saved, the
> displayed record would change to that of another although the new record
had
> been saved to the table.
> At first I thought it was Access playing around (bless it) but have since
> discovered the true cause. Whenever a new customer is entered, a SQL
> trigger fires that will also create a dummy record in another table
> (tbl_MainCaseEntry) ready for the user to enter details. There is an
> essential reason for the trigger but it is too long winded to explain why.
> The trigger reads:
> CREATE TRIGGER trg_NewCustomer
> ON tbl_Customer
> FOR INSERT
> AS
> BEGIN
> DECLARE @.CustID INT, @.CaseCount INT
> SET @.CustID = (SELECT CustomerID FROM Inserted)
> INSERT INTO tbl_MainCaseEntry (CustomerID) VALUES(@.CustID)
> END
> The field CustomerID in tbl_MainCaseEntry is the foreign key with the
table
> having it's own primary key of MainID (set as an identity field seeded
> (1,1)).
> I have since discovered via the Query Analyser that @.@.IDENTITY is pulling
> back the last identity field for the entire statement (in this case the
> MainID in tbl_MainCaseEntry for the new record created by the trigger).
> Is there any way that I can stop this from happening by using
> IDENT_CURRENT('tbl_Customer') and making sure that @.@.IDENTITY is forced
back
> to this value? I have tried to use SET @.@.IDENTITY =
> IDENT_CURRENT('tbl_Customer') but this does not work.
> Any advice would be appreciated as this is driving me mad!!
> Regards
> Dazza
>|||look up scope_identity in BOL
"Dazza" <Post2Group@.Only.com> wrote in message
news:%233683HKMFHA.1096@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>I have a database that sits on SQL Server 2000 and the client is Access XP
>connecting to SQL via ODBC.
> The database has been in use since November 2003 and all has been working
> well. However......over the past w a strange thing has been
> happening that, when new customer details were entered and the record was
> saved, the displayed record would change to that of another although the
> new record had been saved to the table.
> At first I thought it was Access playing around (bless it) but have since
> discovered the true cause. Whenever a new customer is entered, a SQL
> trigger fires that will also create a dummy record in another table
> (tbl_MainCaseEntry) ready for the user to enter details. There is an
> essential reason for the trigger but it is too long winded to explain why.
> The trigger reads:
> CREATE TRIGGER trg_NewCustomer
> ON tbl_Customer
> FOR INSERT
> AS
> BEGIN
> DECLARE @.CustID INT, @.CaseCount INT
> SET @.CustID = (SELECT CustomerID FROM Inserted)
> INSERT INTO tbl_MainCaseEntry (CustomerID) VALUES(@.CustID)
> END
> The field CustomerID in tbl_MainCaseEntry is the foreign key with the
> table having it's own primary key of MainID (set as an identity field
> seeded (1,1)).
> I have since discovered via the Query Analyser that @.@.IDENTITY is pulling
> back the last identity field for the entire statement (in this case the
> MainID in tbl_MainCaseEntry for the new record created by the trigger).
> Is there any way that I can stop this from happening by using
> IDENT_CURRENT('tbl_Customer') and making sure that @.@.IDENTITY is forced
> back to this value? I have tried to use SET @.@.IDENTITY =
> IDENT_CURRENT('tbl_Customer') but this does not work.
> Any advice would be appreciated as this is driving me mad!!
> Regards
> Dazza
>|||I have looked in the BOL regards this feature but cannot understand it's
exact use. Where abouts in my trigger do I use SCOPE_IDENTITY() and what is
the syntax please?
All BOL seems to show is that it will display the identity of the table
where the focus starts (ie tbl_Customer) by using SELECT SCOPE_IDENTITY() AS
[SCOPE_IDENTITY].
Regards
Dazza
"Aaron [SQL Server MVP]" <ten.xoc@.dnartreb.noraa> wrote in message
news:uoXHLKKMFHA.1176@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Use SCOPE_IDENTITY, not @.@.IDENTITY. This side effect is well documented.
> --
> Please post DDL, sample data and desired results.
> See http://www.aspfaq.com/5006 for info.
>
>
> "Dazza" <Post2Group@.Only.com> wrote in message
> news:#3683HKMFHA.1096@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> happening
> had
> table
> back
>|||@.@.IDENTITY is fine to use within the trigger.
But if you want the calling code to return the identity value generated by
its INSERT statement (not the INSERT in the trigger), use SCOPE_IDENTITY()
in the calling code. http://www.aspfaq.com/2174
Please post DDL, sample data and desired results.
See http://www.aspfaq.com/5006 for info.
"Dazza" <Post2Group@.Only.com> wrote in message
news:#kky3OKMFHA.2384@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I have looked in the BOL regards this feature but cannot understand it's
> exact use. Where abouts in my trigger do I use SCOPE_IDENTITY() and what
is
> the syntax please?
> All BOL seems to show is that it will display the identity of the table
> where the focus starts (ie tbl_Customer) by using SELECT SCOPE_IDENTITY()
AS
> [SCOPE_IDENTITY].
> Regards
> Dazza
> "Aaron [SQL Server MVP]" <ten.xoc@.dnartreb.noraa> wrote in message
> news:uoXHLKKMFHA.1176@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
documented.
working
record
since
pulling
>|||I also note another problem here.
I guess you assume that inserts always happen in singleton? You need this
code to be multi-row aware. For example, watch what happens when you do
this:
INSERT Customers(col1, ..., colN)
SELECT 'col1', ..., colN
UNION
SELECT 'col1', ..., colN
To correct this, your INSERT statement inside the trigger should simply be:
INSERT tbl_MainCaseEntry (CustomerID)
SELECT CustomerID FROM Inserted
Or, change the calling stored procedure to handle the logging part of this,
and eliminate the need for a trigger at all. You do control access to this
table via stored procedures, right?
In any case, the calling app can't expect to get back a single @.@.IDENTITY or
SCOPE_IDENTITY() in the multi-row insert case.
(I also think you should consider dropping the superfluous tbl_ prefix, but
that's just an opinion.)
Please post DDL, sample data and desired results.
See http://www.aspfaq.com/5006 for info.|||Aaron
Many thanks for the advice.
I do not use SPs for the entry or retrieval of the data in forms as the
front-end uses linked tables. I have been working with SQL Server for about
a year (mostly admin) and still have a lot to learn regards development
methods for front-end access clients. The database in question is my first
real production development project but there are more to come I have been
told !!
Regards
Dazza
"Aaron [SQL Server MVP]" <ten.xoc@.dnartreb.noraa> wrote in message
news:%23PMTcUKMFHA.2420@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>I also note another problem here.
>
> I guess you assume that inserts always happen in singleton? You need this
> code to be multi-row aware. For example, watch what happens when you do
> this:
> INSERT Customers(col1, ..., colN)
> SELECT 'col1', ..., colN
> UNION
> SELECT 'col1', ..., colN
> To correct this, your INSERT statement inside the trigger should simply
> be:
> INSERT tbl_MainCaseEntry (CustomerID)
> SELECT CustomerID FROM Inserted
> Or, change the calling stored procedure to handle the logging part of
> this,
> and eliminate the need for a trigger at all. You do control access to
> this
> table via stored procedures, right?
> In any case, the calling app can't expect to get back a single @.@.IDENTITY
> or
> SCOPE_IDENTITY() in the multi-row insert case.
> (I also think you should consider dropping the superfluous tbl_ prefix,
> but
> that's just an opinion.)
> --
> Please post DDL, sample data and desired results.
> See http://www.aspfaq.com/5006 for info.
>

Problems converting Access UNION query to SQL

I've got a Union query that works in Access but I'm unable to get it to work
querying a SQL Server. Access was using linked tables so the data was
really coming from SQL anyway. I want to make this query work within
Reporting Services, but I'm receiving the following error message:
ADO error: ORDER BY items must appear in the select list if the statement
contains a UNION operator.
I was able to take the two Select statements from Access and make good SQL
queries with them, but I'm unable to UNION them together eventhough it works
fine in Access. Here's my two queries I'm trying to Union:
SELECT TOP 100 PERCENT dbo.SOP30200.SLPRSNID, dbo.SOP30200.DOCAMNT
FROM dbo.SOP30200 LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.RM00101 ON dbo.SOP30200.CUSTNMBR =
dbo.RM00101.CUSTNMBR
WHERE (dbo.SOP30200.DOCDATE >= CONVERT(DATETIME, '2006-02-15 00:00:00',
102)) AND (dbo.SOP30200.DOCDATE <= '2006-03-01') AND
(dbo.SOP30200.SOPTYPE = 3) AND (dbo.SOP30200.VOIDSTTS
= 0) AND (dbo.SOP30200.DOCID = 'inv')
ORDER BY dbo.SOP30200.SLPRSNID, dbo.SOP30200.CUSTNMBR
UNION
SELECT dbo.SOP30200.SLPRSNID, - (1 * dbo.SOP30200.DOCAMNT) AS expReturns
FROM dbo.SOP30200 LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.RM00101 ON dbo.SOP30200.CUSTNMBR =
dbo.RM00101.CUSTNMBR LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.viewSalesperson ON dbo.RM00101.SLPRSNID =
dbo.viewSalesperson.SLPRSNID
WHERE (dbo.SOP30200.DOCDATE >= CONVERT(DATETIME, '2006-02-15 00:00:00',
102)) AND (dbo.SOP30200.DOCDATE <= CONVERT(DATETIME,
'2006-03-01 00:00:00', 102)) AND
(dbo.SOP30200.VOIDSTTS = 0) AND (dbo.SOP30200.SOPTYPE = 4) AND
(dbo.SOP30200.DOCID = 'returns')order by of the first part of the union should be the problem.
Colin wrote:
>I've got a Union query that works in Access but I'm unable to get it to wor
k
>querying a SQL Server. Access was using linked tables so the data was
>really coming from SQL anyway. I want to make this query work within
>Reporting Services, but I'm receiving the following error message:
>ADO error: ORDER BY items must appear in the select list if the statement
>contains a UNION operator.
>I was able to take the two Select statements from Access and make good SQL
>queries with them, but I'm unable to UNION them together eventhough it work
s
>fine in Access. Here's my two queries I'm trying to Union:
>SELECT TOP 100 PERCENT dbo.SOP30200.SLPRSNID, dbo.SOP30200.DOCAMNT
>FROM dbo.SOP30200 LEFT OUTER JOIN
> dbo.RM00101 ON dbo.SOP30200.CUSTNMBR =
>dbo.RM00101.CUSTNMBR
>WHERE (dbo.SOP30200.DOCDATE >= CONVERT(DATETIME, '2006-02-15 00:00:00',
>102)) AND (dbo.SOP30200.DOCDATE <= '2006-03-01') AND
> (dbo.SOP30200.SOPTYPE = 3) AND (dbo.SOP30200.VOIDSTTS
>= 0) AND (dbo.SOP30200.DOCID = 'inv')
>ORDER BY dbo.SOP30200.SLPRSNID, dbo.SOP30200.CUSTNMBR
>UNION
>SELECT dbo.SOP30200.SLPRSNID, - (1 * dbo.SOP30200.DOCAMNT) AS expReturn
s
>FROM dbo.SOP30200 LEFT OUTER JOIN
> dbo.RM00101 ON dbo.SOP30200.CUSTNMBR =
>dbo.RM00101.CUSTNMBR LEFT OUTER JOIN
> dbo.viewSalesperson ON dbo.RM00101.SLPRSNID =
>dbo.viewSalesperson.SLPRSNID
>WHERE (dbo.SOP30200.DOCDATE >= CONVERT(DATETIME, '2006-02-15 00:00:00',
>102)) AND (dbo.SOP30200.DOCDATE <= CONVERT(DATETIME,
> '2006-03-01 00:00:00', 102)) AND
>(dbo.SOP30200.VOIDSTTS = 0) AND (dbo.SOP30200.SOPTYPE = 4) AND
>(dbo.SOP30200.DOCID = 'returns')
Message posted via webservertalk.com
http://www.webservertalk.com/Uwe/Forum...amming/200603/1|||Any suggestions on what I need to do to fix it?
"psychodad71 via webservertalk.com" <u2248@.uwe> wrote in message
news:5cf4869c57190@.uwe...
> order by of the first part of the union should be the problem.
> Colin wrote:
> --
> Message posted via webservertalk.com
> http://www.webservertalk.com/Uwe/Forum...amming/200603/1|||Syntax is:
SELECT ... FROM ...
UNION (ALL)
SELECT ... FROM ...
ORDER BY...
(I also wonder why a TOP 100 PERCENT. That should return everything and
requires an ORDER BY to work. Get rid of the TOP 100 PERCENT> )
RLF
"Colin" <legendsfan@.nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:etPkz6sQGHA.5924@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Any suggestions on what I need to do to fix it?
> "psychodad71 via webservertalk.com" <u2248@.uwe> wrote in message
> news:5cf4869c57190@.uwe...
>|||Thanks for the help and feedback. I've got it working now. Is there a
reason why Visual Studio or any other design interface doesn't support
Design mode for UNION of two queries?
"Russell Fields" <RussellFields@.NoMailPlease.Com> wrote in message
news:uWwHb5uQGHA.2816@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Syntax is:
> SELECT ... FROM ...
> UNION (ALL)
> SELECT ... FROM ...
> ORDER BY...
> (I also wonder why a TOP 100 PERCENT. That should return everything and
> requires an ORDER BY to work. Get rid of the TOP 100 PERCENT> )
> RLF
> "Colin" <legendsfan@.nospam.nospam> wrote in message
> news:etPkz6sQGHA.5924@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>|||A few notes that may help you (and others):
1. TOP 100 Percent ... ORDER BY was a workaround/hack/creative piece of SQL
to try to get the optimizer to sort values at a point in the query plan.
Unfortunately, it didn't really work in all cases, and it actually isn't
being honored at all in SQL 2005. So, please consider removing this from
your code in the future.
2. As you've seen from the other posts, ORDER BY should be applied to the
end of the complete statement to affect the presentation order of the
results returned to the client (and not each block of the UNION).
3. The column binding rules for Jet Red (Access's engine) never really
conformed to the ANSI standards. Given the installed base, it's not likely
to be changed. So, just be aware that the queries you may have in your
Access application are sometimes interpreted in slightly different ways.
Best of luck,
Conor Cunningham
SQL Server Query Optimization Development Lead
"Colin" <legendsfan@.nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:etPkz6sQGHA.5924@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Any suggestions on what I need to do to fix it?
> "psychodad71 via webservertalk.com" <u2248@.uwe> wrote in message
> news:5cf4869c57190@.uwe...
>

Problems connecting to SQL server on W2K3 from Win 2000 workstatio

We are running SQL Server 2000 on Windows Server 2003 (SP1 not installed).
We are trying to access our databases using Enterprise manager from our
machines in the office using windows authentication. We have no problems
from Windows XP machines (using both TCP/IP and Named Pipes). I can connect
to the server using the SA account (TCP/IP) and Named Pipes from a windows
2000 workstation, but cannot access the SQL server from Windows 2000 machine
s
using TCP/IP.
When we try to log in using Windows 2000 we get "login failed for user
null". From xp machines it goes straight in.
Testing that I have done:
? Set up an alias to the Windows 2003 server name (SQL Server Client Netwo
rk
Utility). No luck
? I can map a folder to the machine using net use command
? I am in the same AD domain.
? The clients are connecting to the server using integrated security (not
allowing SQL authentication)
I cannot understand what’s going on; do you have any pointers on where to
start looking?
ThanksSame here, except we can not to connect from win98 machines. From XP
everything looks fine. Before everything worked for about 1,5 years and
only today morning crashed. Btw, connection to (local) on server machine
works fine. Nobody did any changes in TCP/IP nor in DSN settings.|||This is because you are using Windows authentication without a domain setup.
If you aren't using a domain you shouldn't use windows authentication
because it tends not to work, use SQL Authentication and you'll always
connect. The problem is mainly that the users you are signed in to the W2k
box doesn't match a user on the W2k3 box, or the user isn't passed properly
to SQL, or if you really want to setup Windows authentication use to put the
workstations that servers into a domain..
Thanks,
Mike Bulava, MCDBA
"Mike Allen" <MikeAllen@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:071EE849-F61A-4729-8598-67974D2D5269@.microsoft.com...
> We are running SQL Server 2000 on Windows Server 2003 (SP1 not installed).
> We are trying to access our databases using Enterprise manager from our
> machines in the office using windows authentication. We have no problems
> from Windows XP machines (using both TCP/IP and Named Pipes). I can
> connect
> to the server using the SA account (TCP/IP) and Named Pipes from a windows
> 2000 workstation, but cannot access the SQL server from windows 2000
> machines
> using TCP/IP.
> When we try to log in using Windows 2000 we get "login failed for user
> null". From xp machines it goes straight in.
> Testing that I have done:
> . Set up an alias to the Windows 2003 server name (SQL Server Client
> Network
> Utility). No luck
> . I can map a folder to the machine using net use command
> . I am in the same AD domain.
> . The clients are connecting to the server using integrated security (not
> allowing SQL authentication)
> I cannot understand what's going on; do you have any pointers on where to
> start looking?
> Thanks
>
>

Problems connecting to SQL server on W2K3 from Win 2000 workstatio

We are running SQL Server 2000 on Windows Server 2003 (SP1 not installed).
We are trying to access our databases using Enterprise manager from our
machines in the office using windows authentication. We have no problems
from windows XP machines (using both TCP/IP and Named Pipes). I can connect
to the server using the SA account (TCP/IP) and Named Pipes from a windows
2000 workstation, but cannot access the SQL server from windows 2000 machines
using TCP/IP.
When we try to log in using windows 2000 we get "login failed for user
null". From xp machines it goes straight in.
Testing that I have done:
?Set up an alias to the Windows 2003 server name (SQL Server Client Network
Utility). No luck
?I can map a folder to the machine using net use command
?I am in the same AD domain.
?The clients are connecting to the server using integrated security (not
allowing SQL authentication)
I cannot understand what’s going on; do you have any pointers on where to
start looking?
Thanks
Same here, except we can not to connect from win98 machines. From XP
everything looks fine. Before everything worked for about 1,5 years and
only today morning crashed. Btw, connection to (local) on server machine
works fine. Nobody did any changes in TCP/IP nor in DSN settings.
|||This is because you are using Windows authentication without a domain setup.
If you aren't using a domain you shouldn't use windows authentication
because it tends not to work, use SQL Authentication and you'll always
connect. The problem is mainly that the users you are signed in to the W2k
box doesn't match a user on the W2k3 box, or the user isn't passed properly
to SQL, or if you really want to setup Windows authentication use to put the
workstations that servers into a domain..
Thanks,
Mike Bulava, MCDBA
"Mike Allen" <MikeAllen@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:071EE849-F61A-4729-8598-67974D2D5269@.microsoft.com...
> We are running SQL Server 2000 on Windows Server 2003 (SP1 not installed).
> We are trying to access our databases using Enterprise manager from our
> machines in the office using windows authentication. We have no problems
> from windows XP machines (using both TCP/IP and Named Pipes). I can
> connect
> to the server using the SA account (TCP/IP) and Named Pipes from a windows
> 2000 workstation, but cannot access the SQL server from windows 2000
> machines
> using TCP/IP.
> When we try to log in using windows 2000 we get "login failed for user
> null". From xp machines it goes straight in.
> Testing that I have done:
> . Set up an alias to the Windows 2003 server name (SQL Server Client
> Network
> Utility). No luck
> . I can map a folder to the machine using net use command
> . I am in the same AD domain.
> . The clients are connecting to the server using integrated security (not
> allowing SQL authentication)
> I cannot understand what's going on; do you have any pointers on where to
> start looking?
> Thanks
>
>

Problems connecting to MSDE from client.

Error message: SQL Server not found or access denied.
We have installed our SW on a network with 8 clients. I runs fine on all but
1 client. This client is running Win 2000 and has 3 network cards installed
to be shared by 3 networks.
We use SQL auth. I have run CLICONFG on the client and enabled Names pipes
and TCP as they are on the server with the same port nr.. Our SW loads
correctly from the server so there is connection. I have also pinged the
server.
Olav
hi Olav,
Olav wrote:
> Error message: SQL Server not found or access denied.
> We have installed our SW on a network with 8 clients. I runs fine on
> all but 1 client. This client is running Win 2000 and has 3 network
> cards installed to be shared by 3 networks.
> We use SQL auth. I have run CLICONFG on the client and enabled Names
> pipes and TCP as they are on the server with the same port nr.. Our
> SW loads correctly from the server so there is connection. I have
> also pinged the server.
>
please have a look at
http://support.microsoft.com/default...06&Product=sql
in the client-related causes..
Andrea Montanari (Microsoft MVP - SQL Server)
http://www.asql.biz/DbaMgr.shtmhttp://italy.mvps.org
DbaMgr2k ver 0.15.0 - DbaMgr ver 0.60.0
(my vb6+sql-dmo little try to provide MS MSDE 1.0 and MSDE 2000 a visual
interface)
-- remove DMO to reply
sql

Problems Configuring HTTP Access to SQL Server 2005 Analysis Serveices on Windows XP

I tried to setup HTTP access to SQL Server 2005 Analysis Services on Windows XP, based on the technet article of the same name.

On setting up the virtual directory properties step, I could not add the msmdpump.dll in the Add/Edit Application Extension Mapping as the OK button is greyed out. What needs to be done to enable adding msmdpump.dll?

Any help would be appreciated!

Make sure that ".dll" is in the extension box (don't forget the period). And if the path to msmdpump.dll has an ellipse in the middle of it (...) after you browse to it and select it, click in the path text. The ellipse will go away and the ok button will become active. I had the same problem...|||

Ahha. The dot in front the dll did the trick.

Thank you very much!

problems adding records to linked tables

Hi everyone,

I just used the upsize wizard in Access to create a Access front end and SQL server 2000 backend with linked tables, but I am receiving an error that I can't figure out.

When I am trying to add a record into my 'Cases' linked table in the SQL server, I get a error saying: "Invalid object name" with -2147217865 as the error message.

Here is my code:

Dim testrecord As ADODB.Recordset
Dim conn As ADODB.Connection

Set conn = New ADODB.Connection
conn.ConnectionString = "Provider=sqloledb.1;" & _
"DSN=intelitrak;" & _
"UID=geir;PWD=test"
conn.Mode = adModeReadWrite
conn.Open

Set testrecord = New ADODB.Recordset
testrecord.Open "Cases", conn, adOpenKeyset, adLockOptimistic,
adCmdTableDirect -- the ERROR occurs here!!!

With testrecord
.AddNew
If Forms(stDocName)!NewReopen = "New" Then
!MasterID = NewID
IsReOpen = False
Else

....etc.

I looked all around for an answer, and I partially found a answer at Microsoft's website: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com:80/support/kb/articles/Q218/9/95.asp&NoWebContent=1

However, I do not know how to make this work. I tried to create a stored procedure, and test if that made any differance, but it still said it the it was a invalid object.

Can anyone help me?

GeirJust a shot in the dark...

What if you add dbo_ to the front of Cases|||That was not it.

I tried to put 'dbo_Cases' in my VBA code, but the same error happens.

Geir|||Sorry...mayb a post in the VB forum...

Do you have other code that connects?|||none of my code that involves adding new records to the database is working. The code that views the records, however, works perfectly.

Geir

Problems adding MS access datasource in VB studios 2005 enterprise

I am running Visual Studios 2005 enterprise edition and I am creating a mobile application to keep track of some receipts. The problem I'm currently having is that even though I can connect to the MS Access Database with Server Explorer that I'll be aquiring data from; Everytime I attempt to use the Data Configuration Wizard to add a new data source that namely the database I get this error message:

The new connection uses a data provider that is not supported. (end of message)

There is no username or password necessary to access this database and it is an Access 2003 database.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Just to make sure...

You did change the Data Source to:

Microsoft Access Database File (OLE DB)

Which will use the following .NET Data Provider:

.NET Framework Data Provider for OLE DB

I assume you did in order to select the database, but I just want to make sure.

And when you click the button "Test Connection", it gives you that error?

Regards,

Dave

|||

Well that is the default settings so I just left those as they were and once I had figured out how to connect to the database thru server explorer, whenever I hit the test connection it said Connection ok. However the error message pops up when I attempt to add the database thru the add new datasource wizard.

|||Perhaps I'm missing something, but didn't you say this was a mobile app? Isn't the reason that VS is refusing to use the data source simply because the JET database engine doesn't run on mobile devices? -- Brendan Reynolds Access MVP wrote in message news:b986531d-b456-4194-af38-649f7db26f0d@.discussions.microsoft.com... >I am running Visual Studios 2005 enterprise edition and I am creating a
> mobile application to keep track of some receipts. The problem I'm
> currently having is that even though I can connect to the MS Access
> Database with Server Explorer that I'll be aquiring data from; Everytime
> I attempt to use the Data Configuration Wizard to add a new data source
> that namely the database I get this error message: >
> The new connection uses a data provider that is not supported. (end of
> message) >
> There is no username or password necessary to access this database and
> it is an Access 2003 database. >
> Any help would be greatly appreciated. >
>|||

To: Mr. Reynolds
I have no idea sir, I started the project as a smart device app, and in all the walkthroughs I have viewed nothing has been said about the Jet database engine being incompatible with mobile devices. If this is the case I'd like to know because this project is currently dependent on VS being able to connect with our Access database.

|||

I'm not sure of the limitations, you're best asking at the SQL Mobile Forum.

http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=152&SiteID=1

Am moving this thread to there.

Here's some info on SQL Server 2005 Mobile Edition

http://msdn.microsoft.com/sql/mobile/default.aspx

Alex.

|||The JET database engine runs only on desktop and server versions of Windows. It's certainly possible to develop a mobile web app that talks to a JET database on the server, but if you need a local data store on the mobile device that will remain available when the device is not connected to the network, then you will not be able to use JET. Your alternatives - as I understand it - include SQL Server CE and XML. There is a database engine on the Pocket PC called 'Pocket Access' but it has very little to do with the desktop product, and there is no built-in support for 'Pocket Access' in the .NET framework. There is, however, a third-party component you could look at. There's an article on this at the URL below, and there's a link from the article to the vendor of the third-party component. Note that I haven't personally used this, and I don't know what plans, if any, Microsoft has to continue to support 'Pocket Access'. So this isn't a recommendation, just something that may be worth further investigation. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnroad/html/road10222003.asp There's an interesting article on 'Data Access Strategies for the Microsoft ..NET Compact Framework' at the following URL. Although the article dates back to the .NET 1.0 timeframe, I believe it is still relevant. http://msdn.microsoft.com/mobility/understanding/articles/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnnetcomp/html/dataaccessstrategy.asp -- Brendan Reynolds Access MVP wrote in message news:703e94a5-811d-4486-927c-34c62b34dc36_WBRev1_@.discussions.microsoft.com...
> This post has been edited either by the author or a moderator in the
> Microsoft Forums: http://forums.microsoft.com
> To: Mr. Reynolds
> I have no idea sir, I started the project as a smart device app, and in
> all the walkthroughs I have viewed nothing has been said about the Jet
> database engine being incompatible with mobile devices. If this is the
> case I'd like to know because this project is currently dependent on VS
> being able to connect with our Access database. > > > >
>|||Thank you for the information. Unfortunately I have a follow up question. If I were to make an intermediate SQL database to function as the go between for a SQL Mobile database and a Microsoft access database, is such a solution even possible? Our organization recently purchased VS 2005 on the assumption that it would be easy to use the .NET framework to develop a mobile app that would easily transfer data to an access database. Now with this new information its quite possible the data will go SQL Mobile -> SQL Database -> MS Access database.
Footnote:
The SQL Database would just function as a temporary store to check data generated from receipts made in the mobile database. Once the checks are done the corrected data would be passed to the MS Access database. Then the SQL database would wipe itself clean.
|||

Yes, but it makes no sense. To accomplish that you would have to purchase SQL 2000/2005 and pay CALs per device (or per CPU license). If that’s acceptable, simply get rid of Access and use much more powerful SQL you've paid for.

Alternative solution is to use Web Service to talk to Access database. Create couple WEB methods to talk to access and call them from device. Something like this should do:

DataSet GetAccessData(String command, …)

{

// Connect to Access DB here, execute command and populate data set with returned data.

return dataSet;

}

Bool UpdateAccessData(DataSet dataSet, … )

{

// Connect to Access DB here and update DB with data from Data Set.

return success;

}

|||To: Ilya
The enterprise edition that we purchased of VBS 2005 came with SQL server 2005 and I just installed it upon learning that I can't communicate directly with the Access database. I'm not sure if we still have to pay the CALS per device though.
If I used these web service methods where would I write them? In the upload and download portion of the code for the mobile app?
|||

I believe it comes with 5 CALs (to be verified).

These WS methods would run on desktop via IIS which would host WS. To create them, please click ‘Create/Web Site’ and choose "ASP.Net Web Service". You'll get project skeleton, simply add code you need and run it. Decorate added methods with WebMethod attribute. This is desktop project, so you could use anything desktop has to offer.

Calling WS from device pretty much looks like a normal function call. All necessary code would be created for you automatically as soon as you add Web Reference to your project.

|||i want to connecting Access database on PDA ?
i am setting Access database on PDA..
can i do ?
and how i doing?|||How would one connect to an access database inside the web method?
|||

while the .NET Compact Framework has no APIs to leverage Access databases, there is an open source set of APIs that support Access at www.opennetcf.org

there are also some commercial libraries available - use Google Advanced Groups search on microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.compactframework and look for "Access Database"

Darren

Problems adding MS access datasource in VB studios 2005 enterprise

I am running Visual Studios 2005 enterprise edition and I am creating a mobile application to keep track of some receipts. The problem I'm currently having is that even though I can connect to the MS Access Database with Server Explorer that I'll be aquiring data from; Everytime I attempt to use the Data Configuration Wizard to add a new data source that namely the database I get this error message:

The new connection uses a data provider that is not supported. (end of message)

There is no username or password necessary to access this database and it is an Access 2003 database.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Just to make sure...

You did change the Data Source to:

Microsoft Access Database File (OLE DB)

Which will use the following .NET Data Provider:

.NET Framework Data Provider for OLE DB

I assume you did in order to select the database, but I just want to make sure.

And when you click the button "Test Connection", it gives you that error?

Regards,

Dave

|||

Well that is the default settings so I just left those as they were and once I had figured out how to connect to the database thru server explorer, whenever I hit the test connection it said Connection ok. However the error message pops up when I attempt to add the database thru the add new datasource wizard.

|||Perhaps I'm missing something, but didn't you say this was a mobile app? Isn't the reason that VS is refusing to use the data source simply because the JET database engine doesn't run on mobile devices? -- Brendan Reynolds Access MVP wrote in message news:b986531d-b456-4194-af38-649f7db26f0d@.discussions.microsoft.com... >I am running Visual Studios 2005 enterprise edition and I am creating a
> mobile application to keep track of some receipts. The problem I'm
> currently having is that even though I can connect to the MS Access
> Database with Server Explorer that I'll be aquiring data from; Everytime
> I attempt to use the Data Configuration Wizard to add a new data source
> that namely the database I get this error message: >
> The new connection uses a data provider that is not supported. (end of
> message) >
> There is no username or password necessary to access this database and
> it is an Access 2003 database. >
> Any help would be greatly appreciated. >
>|||

To: Mr. Reynolds
I have no idea sir, I started the project as a smart device app, and in all the walkthroughs I have viewed nothing has been said about the Jet database engine being incompatible with mobile devices. If this is the case I'd like to know because this project is currently dependent on VS being able to connect with our Access database.

|||

I'm not sure of the limitations, you're best asking at the SQL Mobile Forum.

http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=152&SiteID=1

Am moving this thread to there.

Here's some info on SQL Server 2005 Mobile Edition

http://msdn.microsoft.com/sql/mobile/default.aspx

Alex.

|||The JET database engine runs only on desktop and server versions of Windows. It's certainly possible to develop a mobile web app that talks to a JET database on the server, but if you need a local data store on the mobile device that will remain available when the device is not connected to the network, then you will not be able to use JET. Your alternatives - as I understand it - include SQL Server CE and XML. There is a database engine on the Pocket PC called 'Pocket Access' but it has very little to do with the desktop product, and there is no built-in support for 'Pocket Access' in the .NET framework. There is, however, a third-party component you could look at. There's an article on this at the URL below, and there's a link from the article to the vendor of the third-party component. Note that I haven't personally used this, and I don't know what plans, if any, Microsoft has to continue to support 'Pocket Access'. So this isn't a recommendation, just something that may be worth further investigation. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnroad/html/road10222003.asp There's an interesting article on 'Data Access Strategies for the Microsoft ..NET Compact Framework' at the following URL. Although the article dates back to the .NET 1.0 timeframe, I believe it is still relevant. http://msdn.microsoft.com/mobility/understanding/articles/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnnetcomp/html/dataaccessstrategy.asp -- Brendan Reynolds Access MVP wrote in message news:703e94a5-811d-4486-927c-34c62b34dc36_WBRev1_@.discussions.microsoft.com...
> This post has been edited either by the author or a moderator in the
> Microsoft Forums: http://forums.microsoft.com
> To: Mr. Reynolds
> I have no idea sir, I started the project as a smart device app, and in
> all the walkthroughs I have viewed nothing has been said about the Jet
> database engine being incompatible with mobile devices. If this is the
> case I'd like to know because this project is currently dependent on VS
> being able to connect with our Access database. > > > >
>|||Thank you for the information. Unfortunately I have a follow up question. If I were to make an intermediate SQL database to function as the go between for a SQL Mobile database and a Microsoft access database, is such a solution even possible? Our organization recently purchased VS 2005 on the assumption that it would be easy to use the .NET framework to develop a mobile app that would easily transfer data to an access database. Now with this new information its quite possible the data will go SQL Mobile -> SQL Database -> MS Access database.
Footnote:
The SQL Database would just function as a temporary store to check data generated from receipts made in the mobile database. Once the checks are done the corrected data would be passed to the MS Access database. Then the SQL database would wipe itself clean.
|||

Yes, but it makes no sense. To accomplish that you would have to purchase SQL 2000/2005 and pay CALs per device (or per CPU license). If that’s acceptable, simply get rid of Access and use much more powerful SQL you've paid for.

Alternative solution is to use Web Service to talk to Access database. Create couple WEB methods to talk to access and call them from device. Something like this should do:

DataSet GetAccessData(String command, …)

{

// Connect to Access DB here, execute command and populate data set with returned data.

return dataSet;

}

Bool UpdateAccessData(DataSet dataSet, … )

{

// Connect to Access DB here and update DB with data from Data Set.

return success;

}

|||To: Ilya
The enterprise edition that we purchased of VBS 2005 came with SQL server 2005 and I just installed it upon learning that I can't communicate directly with the Access database. I'm not sure if we still have to pay the CALS per device though.
If I used these web service methods where would I write them? In the upload and download portion of the code for the mobile app?
|||

I believe it comes with 5 CALs (to be verified).

These WS methods would run on desktop via IIS which would host WS. To create them, please click ‘Create/Web Site’ and choose "ASP.Net Web Service". You'll get project skeleton, simply add code you need and run it. Decorate added methods with WebMethod attribute. This is desktop project, so you could use anything desktop has to offer.

Calling WS from device pretty much looks like a normal function call. All necessary code would be created for you automatically as soon as you add Web Reference to your project.

|||i want to connecting Access database on PDA ?
i am setting Access database on PDA..
can i do ?
and how i doing?|||How would one connect to an access database inside the web method?
|||

while the .NET Compact Framework has no APIs to leverage Access databases, there is an open source set of APIs that support Access at www.opennetcf.org

there are also some commercial libraries available - use Google Advanced Groups search on microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.compactframework and look for "Access Database"

Darren

Problems acessing the database after creating a website on localhost

I cannot access the data source when I create a website in express - when I try to connect to the database I get an error telling that I am unable to connect to the data source - I tried doing it through the Visual Studio and through the Web Configaration.

Can some please help - I need to conncet!!!

What the connction string and the exact error message ?

Jens K. Suessmeyer

http://www.sqlserver2005.de

|||

"Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to failure in starting the process for the user instance. The connection will be closed"

This is the error messgae that I get when I try to connect to the data source.

Can you help?

|||Do you have SQL Server Express installed ?

Jens K. Suessmeyer

http://www.sqlserver2005.de

|||

Reese C. M. Harris wrote:

"Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to failure in starting the process for the user instance. The connection will be closed"

This is the error messgae that I get when I try to connect to the data source.

Can you help?

This is a known issue and the solution is the one posted by user Reen in the long thread below. Hope this helps.

http://forums.microsoft.com/msdn/showpost.aspx?postid=293667&siteid=1&sb=0&d=1&at=7&ft=11&tf=0&pageid=0

Problems Access Violtions Adoquery

i was experimenting with ado and have come across the following problems:

i've two forms one of which is a main form and the other is a form containing the adoquery1 and grid to display the results of a query.

On running a query and displaying the results if, i close the second form containing the grid and adoquery1,while the query is still running i get a error saying that i cannnot perform the operation an a closed dataset and futher if a say ok to the message it givies me a read address exception error.

i have traied to trap the first error about the dataset but the second error about the read address givies me problem.

You advise is much appreciated in this problem.Why do you want to close the second form while the query is still running?

problem: user account access (always uses the same account)

I've configured the IIS with only windows authentication, when i connect to
Reporting Server or Reporting Administrator uses the windows account, but
the security rules work different:
I have configured rules for two accounts: my windows account and
IUSR_machine.
When i try to connect to servers i put my windows account and goes ok, but
the security rules works with the rules assigned to the iusr_machine. Any
rule assigned to my user doesn't have effect, and all the changes makes in
the IUSR_machine's rules have effect.
I've configured restrict access to the iusr_machine and grant permission for
my windows account. When i connect with my windows account and i try to do
any task that iusr_machine haven't permission, the server response me that
the iusr_machine haven't permmission to do it.
Any idea?
thank you.
Oliver
"Brian Welcker [MSFT]" <bwelcker@.online.microsoft.com> escribió en el
mensaje news:OT0ifxqZEHA.212@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Usually this is because anonymous is set on the IIS web site settings.
>
> --
> Brian Welcker
> Group Program Manager
> SQL Server Reporting Services
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
>
> "oli" <oli1350@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eHPoJtZZEHA.3132@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > Hi,
> > I'm having problem with the authentication in reports. When a user
sign
> > in to Report Administrator or Report Server validates with the IIS'
> > configuration. Onces inside always use the same user with the rules
> > security: IWAM_machine.
> > I need the account used inside of Reporting Server/Reporting
> > Administration
> > should be the same that the account used to validates with IIS.
> >
> > It's possible'
> >
> > Thank you in advanced.
> >
> > Oliver
> >
> >
>
>You have to disable anonymous access for both Reports and Reportserver
virtual directories.
--
Tudor Trufinescu
Dev Lead
Sql Server Reporting Services
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"oli" <oli1350@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:#YUfIwBaEHA.212@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> I've configured the IIS with only windows authentication, when i connect
to
> Reporting Server or Reporting Administrator uses the windows account, but
> the security rules work different:
> I have configured rules for two accounts: my windows account and
> IUSR_machine.
> When i try to connect to servers i put my windows account and goes ok, but
> the security rules works with the rules assigned to the iusr_machine. Any
> rule assigned to my user doesn't have effect, and all the changes makes in
> the IUSR_machine's rules have effect.
> I've configured restrict access to the iusr_machine and grant permission
for
> my windows account. When i connect with my windows account and i try to do
> any task that iusr_machine haven't permission, the server response me
that
> the iusr_machine haven't permmission to do it.
> Any idea?
> thank you.
> Oliver
> "Brian Welcker [MSFT]" <bwelcker@.online.microsoft.com> escribió en el
> mensaje news:OT0ifxqZEHA.212@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > Usually this is because anonymous is set on the IIS web site settings.
> >
> > --
> > Brian Welcker
> > Group Program Manager
> > SQL Server Reporting Services
> >
> > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> >
> > "oli" <oli1350@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:eHPoJtZZEHA.3132@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm having problem with the authentication in reports. When a user
> sign
> > > in to Report Administrator or Report Server validates with the IIS'
> > > configuration. Onces inside always use the same user with the rules
> > > security: IWAM_machine.
> > > I need the account used inside of Reporting Server/Reporting
> > > Administration
> > > should be the same that the account used to validates with IIS.
> > >
> > > It's possible'
> > >
> > > Thank you in advanced.
> > >
> > > Oliver
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>|||I uses the windows integrated authentication in both, but with the same
result: the rules works like if i authenticates with iwam_machine.
"Tudor Trufinescu (MSFT)" <tudortr@.ms.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:utWbctEaEHA.2792@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> You have to disable anonymous access for both Reports and Reportserver
> virtual directories.
> --
> Tudor Trufinescu
> Dev Lead
> Sql Server Reporting Services
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
> "oli" <oli1350@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:#YUfIwBaEHA.212@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > I've configured the IIS with only windows authentication, when i connect
> to
> > Reporting Server or Reporting Administrator uses the windows account,
but
> > the security rules work different:
> > I have configured rules for two accounts: my windows account and
> > IUSR_machine.
> >
> > When i try to connect to servers i put my windows account and goes ok,
but
> > the security rules works with the rules assigned to the iusr_machine.
Any
> > rule assigned to my user doesn't have effect, and all the changes makes
in
> > the IUSR_machine's rules have effect.
> >
> > I've configured restrict access to the iusr_machine and grant permission
> for
> > my windows account. When i connect with my windows account and i try to
do
> > any task that iusr_machine haven't permission, the server response me
> that
> > the iusr_machine haven't permmission to do it.
> >
> > Any idea?
> >
> > thank you.
> >
> > Oliver
> >
> > "Brian Welcker [MSFT]" <bwelcker@.online.microsoft.com> escribió en el
> > mensaje news:OT0ifxqZEHA.212@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > > Usually this is because anonymous is set on the IIS web site settings.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Brian Welcker
> > > Group Program Manager
> > > SQL Server Reporting Services
> > >
> > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> > rights.
> > >
> > > "oli" <oli1350@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:eHPoJtZZEHA.3132@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I'm having problem with the authentication in reports. When a
user
> > sign
> > > > in to Report Administrator or Report Server validates with the IIS'
> > > > configuration. Onces inside always use the same user with the rules
> > > > security: IWAM_machine.
> > > > I need the account used inside of Reporting Server/Reporting
> > > > Administration
> > > > should be the same that the account used to validates with IIS.
> > > >
> > > > It's possible'
> > > >
> > > > Thank you in advanced.
> > > >
> > > > Oliver
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>|||sorry,
i wanted to say i uses only windows integrated authentication in both(not
uses anonymous access)
"oli" <oli1350@.hotmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:ub%23HEVLaEHA.3420@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> I uses the windows integrated authentication in both, but with the same
> result: the rules works like if i authenticates with iwam_machine.
>
> "Tudor Trufinescu (MSFT)" <tudortr@.ms.com> escribió en el mensaje
> news:utWbctEaEHA.2792@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > You have to disable anonymous access for both Reports and Reportserver
> > virtual directories.
> >
> > --
> > Tudor Trufinescu
> > Dev Lead
> > Sql Server Reporting Services
> > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> >
> > "oli" <oli1350@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:#YUfIwBaEHA.212@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > > I've configured the IIS with only windows authentication, when i
connect
> > to
> > > Reporting Server or Reporting Administrator uses the windows account,
> but
> > > the security rules work different:
> > > I have configured rules for two accounts: my windows account and
> > > IUSR_machine.
> > >
> > > When i try to connect to servers i put my windows account and goes ok,
> but
> > > the security rules works with the rules assigned to the iusr_machine.
> Any
> > > rule assigned to my user doesn't have effect, and all the changes
makes
> in
> > > the IUSR_machine's rules have effect.
> > >
> > > I've configured restrict access to the iusr_machine and grant
permission
> > for
> > > my windows account. When i connect with my windows account and i try
to
> do
> > > any task that iusr_machine haven't permission, the server response me
> > that
> > > the iusr_machine haven't permmission to do it.
> > >
> > > Any idea?
> > >
> > > thank you.
> > >
> > > Oliver
> > >
> > > "Brian Welcker [MSFT]" <bwelcker@.online.microsoft.com> escribió en el
> > > mensaje news:OT0ifxqZEHA.212@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > > > Usually this is because anonymous is set on the IIS web site
settings.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Brian Welcker
> > > > Group Program Manager
> > > > SQL Server Reporting Services
> > > >
> > > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> > > rights.
> > > >
> > > > "oli" <oli1350@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:eHPoJtZZEHA.3132@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > I'm having problem with the authentication in reports. When a
> user
> > > sign
> > > > > in to Report Administrator or Report Server validates with the
IIS'
> > > > > configuration. Onces inside always use the same user with the
rules
> > > > > security: IWAM_machine.
> > > > > I need the account used inside of Reporting Server/Reporting
> > > > > Administration
> > > > > should be the same that the account used to validates with IIS.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's possible'
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you in advanced.
> > > > >
> > > > > Oliver
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Problem: mssql locks several records in a specific table, while no one is editing them

Hi,
I have an Access application with linked tables via ODBC to MSSQL
server 2000.

Having a weird problem, probably something i've done while not being
aware of (kinda newbie).

the last 20 records (and growing)of a specific table are locked - cant
change them - ("another user is editing these records ... ").

I know for a fact that no one is editing records and yet no user can
edit these last records in the MDB - including the administrator -
while able to add new records.

Administrator able to edit records in the ADP (mssql server) where the
tables are stored.

Please help, the application is renedred inert .

Thanks for reading,
Oren.Hi

I can't say that I am an expert on access, but this sounds like the
recordset may need refreshing i.e someone has changed the record and access
knows the local copy is out of date.

John

"Oren" <orentini@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b1368c93.0409160909.128bae81@.posting.google.c om...
> Hi,
> I have an Access application with linked tables via ODBC to MSSQL
> server 2000.
> Having a weird problem, probably something i've done while not being
> aware of (kinda newbie).
> the last 20 records (and growing)of a specific table are locked - cant
> change them - ("another user is editing these records ... ").
> I know for a fact that no one is editing records and yet no user can
> edit these last records in the MDB - including the administrator -
> while able to add new records.
> Administrator able to edit records in the ADP (mssql server) where the
> tables are stored.
> Please help, the application is renedred inert .
> Thanks for reading,
> Oren.|||Hi,
thanks for replying.

There is no local and remote copy of the table, the table is only
stored in the sql server and linked to the access MDB.

Simple refresh wont do (tried it, via the access menubars).

have any more suggestions?

Thanks,

Oren,

"John Bell" <jbellnewsposts@.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<414b53f6$0$27296$afc38c87@.news.easynet.co.uk>...
> Hi
> I can't say that I am an expert on access, but this sounds like the
> recordset may need refreshing i.e someone has changed the record and access
> knows the local copy is out of date.
> John
> "Oren" <orentini@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:b1368c93.0409160909.128bae81@.posting.google.c om...
> > Hi,
> > I have an Access application with linked tables via ODBC to MSSQL
> > server 2000.
> > Having a weird problem, probably something i've done while not being
> > aware of (kinda newbie).
> > the last 20 records (and growing)of a specific table are locked - cant
> > change them - ("another user is editing these records ... ").
> > I know for a fact that no one is editing records and yet no user can
> > edit these last records in the MDB - including the administrator -
> > while able to add new records.
> > Administrator able to edit records in the ADP (mssql server) where the
> > tables are stored.
> > Please help, the application is renedred inert .
> > Thanks for reading,
> > Oren.|||Hi

You may want to post this is an access news group!

John

"Oren" <orentini@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b1368c93.0409180015.718465e6@.posting.google.c om...
> Hi,
> thanks for replying.
> There is no local and remote copy of the table, the table is only
> stored in the sql server and linked to the access MDB.
> Simple refresh wont do (tried it, via the access menubars).
> have any more suggestions?
> Thanks,
> Oren,
>
> "John Bell" <jbellnewsposts@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<414b53f6$0$27296$afc38c87@.news.easynet.co.uk>...
> > Hi
> > I can't say that I am an expert on access, but this sounds like the
> > recordset may need refreshing i.e someone has changed the record and
access
> > knows the local copy is out of date.
> > John
> > "Oren" <orentini@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:b1368c93.0409160909.128bae81@.posting.google.c om...
> > > Hi,
> > > I have an Access application with linked tables via ODBC to MSSQL
> > > server 2000.
> > > > Having a weird problem, probably something i've done while not being
> > > aware of (kinda newbie).
> > > > the last 20 records (and growing)of a specific table are locked - cant
> > > change them - ("another user is editing these records ... ").
> > > > I know for a fact that no one is editing records and yet no user can
> > > edit these last records in the MDB - including the administrator -
> > > while able to add new records.
> > > > Administrator able to edit records in the ADP (mssql server) where the
> > > tables are stored.
> > > > Please help, the application is renedred inert .
> > > > Thanks for reading,
> > > Oren.

problem with WIN2000 client

One Winn 2000 workstatiom has problem with ACCESS 2003 ODBC conection to SQL
server on WIN 2003 server. Other clients are all WINXP. This cient is on the
different domain too. Some reports works, and some have error, ask for
password again but not accept it even if it is supplied again. Application
on other clients works well.Hi Zeljko,
I noticed that the issue was posted in this newsgroup as a duplicated one.
You have another post titled "problem with WIN2000 client" and I will add a
reply to that post. If you have follow up questions, please post there and
I will work with you. Thanks you very much.
Sincerely yours,
Michael Cheng
Microsoft Online Support
****************************************
*******************
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
Please reply to newsgroups only, many thanks.

problem with WIN2000 client

One Winn 2000 workstatiom has problem with ACCESS 2003 ODBC conection to SQL
server on WIN 2003 server. Other clients are all WINXP. This cient is on the
different domain too. Some reports works, and some have error, ask for
password again but not accept it even if it is supplied again. Application
on other clients works well.
Hi Zeljko,
I noticed that the issue was posted in this newsgroup as a duplicated one.
You have another post titled "problem with WIN2000 client" and I will add a
reply to that post. If you have follow up questions, please post there and
I will work with you. Thanks you very much.
Sincerely yours,
Michael Cheng
Microsoft Online Support
************************************************** *********
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
Please reply to newsgroups only, many thanks.

Problem with win2000 and xp seeing the server

I have sql server 8.0 installed on my win2000 machine and a xp machine trying to access that server. I have my network connected through a linksys router. I can connect to the internet but can not access the server.
Mike,
Not clear. Did you mean the WinXP client cannot access the SQLServer in
Win2000? If so, what is the error?
Dinesh
SQL Server MVP
--
SQL Server FAQ at
http://www.tkdinesh.com
"Mike" <Mike@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:16317F90-3264-4C74-B73C-38383992615B@.microsoft.com...
> I have sql server 8.0 installed on my win2000 machine and a xp machine
trying to access that server. I have my network connected through a linksys
router. I can connect to the internet but can not access the server.